Bitcoin: U.S. reserves lower than expected according to the warning from Cynthia Lummis

The new revelations about the Bitcoin reserves of the United States government have generated a heated public and political debate. Recent documents obtained from the United States Marshals Service reveal a situation different from what has been hypothesized in recent years. 

The assets held would amount to 28.988 BTC, with a value of approximately 3.4 billion dollars, far from previous estimates that indicated reserves of about 200,000 BTC.

NUOVO: Gli US Marshalls rivelano che il governo ora detiene solo 28,988 Bitcoin per un valore di $3.4 miliardi, invece dei ~200,000 BTC stimati pic.twitter.com/6a4UcPFiHc

— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) 16 luglio 2025

The initiative that uncovered the Bitcoin case in the United States

Causing a stir was an initiative by the president of Bitcoin Magazine, who offered a reward of $10,000 for anyone who could discover and prove the actual amount of state Bitcoin reserves. This gesture prompted several investigative journalists to mobilize, including Lola Leetz, who later published the official documents obtained.

The information has found new confirmations with the data reported in the documentation of the Marshall Service. These official documents highlight how the value of digital assets held by the government stops at about 3.44 billion dollars, a figure that is a very small percentage compared to what is generally believed by the criptovalute community.

The reaction of Senator Cynthia Lummis and the impact on the debate

The news about the reduction of U.S. Bitcoin reserves has deeply alarmed Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis, a long-time supporter of the crypto ecosystem in the United States. She stated that if the emerging data were accurate, the government would have alienated over 80% of its resources in Bitcoin, leaving only about 29,000 coins in circulation.

According to the senator, this would represent a serious strategic mistake, as it could compromise the competitive position of the United States in the global landscape of digital assets. Lummis emphasized the risk of leaving other international players with an advantage in the accumulation of Bitcoin reserves, given the growing importance of this technology in the world financial markets.

The silence of the government and the reactions of the fintech sector

In the face of these statements, the federal government has not yet released official comments or denials on the figures that have emerged. This lack of transparency has contributed to increasing tension within the fintech community and among institutional observers, reinforcing doubts about the real strategy adopted by the United States in managing digital assets.

In the sector, attention has increased towards the possibility that the choices of reserve liquidation had fiscal, judicial, or strategic motivations, even if the documents that have emerged so far do not explain in detail the reasons for such sales. The issue remains open, awaiting further clarification from the federal authorities.

The potential strategic implications for the United States

The publication of data relating to the actual Bitcoin reserves raises profound questions about American financial policy regarding cryptocurrencies. In the past, the federal Bitcoin reserves have always been perceived as significant both for ensuring stability in confiscation procedures and for constituting a potential digital treasure trove.

However, the sale of 85% of the original reserves, as current data suggests, could reduce the State’s ability to act towards emerging markets. Furthermore, the decrease of the U.S. “buffer” in Bitcoin makes the gap between Washington’s policy and the approach adopted by other countries more pronounced, as they aim to accumulate strategic digital reserves to diversify their assets.

Questions and Open Issues on Bitcoin and Federal Privacy

The case of the strategic Bitcoin reserve, approved through an executive order by President Trump, brings back to the forefront the issue of transparency in the asset management decisions of public institutions. While the private sector moves with maximum transparency and traceability thanks to the very nature of the blockchain, the path taken by the U.S. government seems driven by still unclear needs.

• Why sell such a large share of your own Bitcoin?
• What are the strategic motivations behind the operations?
• What implications will this choice have for investors and global markets?

These questions reflect the growing attention towards the role of the United States in the digital economy. The absence of official communications only increases the pressure on Washington for greater clarity.

Possible future scenarios and the role of Bitcoin in state finance

In the absence of government responses and more up-to-date data, hypotheses about future strategies of the United States are multiplying. Cautious policies in crypto resources might prevail, or there could be a return to the purchase of Bitcoin as a strategic reserve.

What is certain is that the publication of the figures related to the federal digital assets will have a lasting impact on financial policies and on the perception of cryptocurrencies themselves as assets of strategic importance. The United States will now have to face the debate on the need to align their asset management with the challenges posed by new financial technologies.

Navigating Uncertainty: New Perspectives on U.S. Policy Regarding Bitcoin

The issue raised by journalistic investigations and the statements of Senator Lummis highlights the centrality of Bitcoin in the national strategic debate. It is evident how transparency, innovation, and the ability to adapt to global markets emerge today as essential requirements for effective management of public digital assets.

The sector and investors are now closely watching the future moves of the government. The situation represents an opportunity for reflection on how the United States can strengthen or revise its position in the new era of finanza decentralizzata. In the background, the importance of well-considered strategic choices remains clear, choices that can ensure U.S. leadership in the global cryptocurrency arena.